Neurotechnology

Comprehensive Summary

This study describes the neural mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), which is utilized to restore voluntary movement in people with paralysis, enabling the brain to regain control over spinal motoneurons. Previously, SCS has been shown to restore movement in individuals with spinal cord injury and stroke, but it's never been proven. By combining computational modeling, monkey electrophysiology, and human recordings, the researchers conclude that recovery. The residual supraspinal drive produces a small depolarization that’s not enough to generate movement but raises the membrane potential close to threshold. When subthreshold EPSPs occur, they can be transformed into action potentials. This shows that motor neurons fire in similar patterns at 100 Hz SCS pulse intervals in simulations and in monkeys. This pattern creates two distinct parameter regions: a voluntary one, in which SCS impulses become suprathreshold only with supraspinal input, and an involuntary regime, in which SCS alone drives motoneurons and overrides voluntary control. They also show that the voluntary regime shrinks dramatically as lesion severity increases, meaning severe injury leaves a very narrow window of SCS parameters that allow genuine volitional control. These predictions were validated in electrophysiological experiments. In anesthetized monkeys, pairing internal capsule stimulation with SCS increased SCS-evoked reflexes by up to 285%, demonstrating that corticospinal inputs facilitate SCS-mediated EPSPs. Similarly, in humans with paralysis, motor units show a response to SCS with a 40-100% of spikes in stimulation pulses. These results help clarify the mechanism by which SCS and residual brain activity interact to restore voluntary movement.

Outcomes and Implications

This study has important implications because SCS is used to help in motor recovery after spinal cord injury, stroke, and other conditions that affect the descending motor pathways. In addition to acting as a neuromodulator to increase motor neurons' excitability, the SS provides a timed subthreshold input that the brain can then convert into functional activity. This means the success of SCS depends on the presence of an intact residual supraspinal pathway. This means that when using SCS for clinical purposes, the threshold should be set higher than the threshold to help patients learn to suppress or enhance SCS-driven activation through voluntary or involuntary excitatory and inhibitory control. For patients with extensive injuries and lesions, the SCS parameters have been shown to reduce the voluntary rate from 38 to 4% in monkey and human data. While these results and the effects of SCS are promising, the variability of voluntary and involuntary actions within each patient makes it easy to produce co-contraction or movements that can’t be shaped or controlled by SCS and therefore require varying amplitudes for each patient rather than a single parameter. By accompanying rehabilitation training, closed-loop stimulation, and spatiotemporal stimulation patterns, the patients’ ability to adapt and shape SCS-driven activity increases, which will overall help with artificial stimulation and motor commands in the future.

Our mission is to

Connect medicine with AI innovation.

No spam. Only the latest AI breakthroughs, simplified and relevant to your field.

Our mission is to

Connect medicine with AI innovation.

No spam. Only the latest AI breakthroughs, simplified and relevant to your field.

Our mission is to

Connect medicine with AI innovation.

No spam. Only the latest AI breakthroughs, simplified and relevant to your field.

AIIM Research

Articles

© 2025 AIIM. Created by AIIM IT Team

AIIM Research

Articles

© 2025 AIIM. Created by AIIM IT Team

AIIM Research

Articles

© 2025 AIIM. Created by AIIM IT Team