Comprehensive Summary
Buckley et al. conducted an observational pilot study to assess the feasibility of a 72-hour rapid low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol for patients with opioid use disorder in an emergency department observational unit (EDOU) from July 2023 to June 2024. Eligible patients presented with opioid use disorder, were willing to start buprenorphine, and either did not meet criteria for traditional full-dose induction or had received naloxone for overdose more than one hour prior to presentation. Exclusion criteria included moderate-to-severe withdrawal, daily methadone doses exceeding 70 mg, acute psychiatric decompensation, or concurrent alcohol withdrawal. Among 55 enrolled patients, 33 (66%) achieved treatment success, defined as discharge on at least 8 mg of sublingual buprenorphine or after one dose of extended-released buprenorphine (BUP-XR), exceeding the predetermined feasibility threshold of 50%. At 30 days, 24% of all enrolled patients maintained buprenorphine treatment, with higher retention among those achieving initial treatment success (39%) and those receiving BUP-XR (54%). Within 90 days, opioid-related ED return visits occurred in 40% of all patients and 36% of those who achieved treatment success.
Outcomes and Implications
Traditional buprenorphine induction requires patients to be in moderate withdrawal to avoid precipitated withdrawal, a painful syndrome that can deter treatment engagement. This creates a dilemma for ED patients who are not in withdrawal or have recently received naloxone, as they face delays in starting medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). This pilot study demonstrates that a 72-hour EDOU protocol using low-dose "microdosing" approach achieved 66% treatment success, substantially higher than outpatient low-dose protocols (34-36%). The supervised EDOU setting likely contributed to this success by allowing dose titration, managing side effects, and providing continuous support during a vulnerable period. The protocol's key advantage is flexibility, as it can be initiated at any time regardless of withdrawal status, potentially expanding treatment access for patients who would otherwise be turned away. However, the 24% overall retention at 30 days highlights the persistent challenge of maintaining engagement beyond initiation, suggesting that successful induction alone is insufficient without robust linkage to ongoing care. The 54% retention rate among BUP-XR patients suggests extended-release formulations may improve adherence. Important limitations include the small sample size, single-center design, lack of a control group, and potential selection bias favoring motivated patients. Not all EDs have observation units capable of 72-hour stays, limiting generalizability. However, given the substantial burden of untreated OUD in emergency settings and high mortality risk following ED discharge, dedicated EDOU pathways for MOUD initiation represent a promising harm reduction strategy that warrants further investigation in larger, controlled trials.