Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Quality of Life Improvement After Surgery for Spinal Metastases

Spine

Spine

Research Authors: Kitagawa, Kyota MD; Maki, Satoshi MD, PhD; Shiratani, Yuki MD; Suzuki, Akinobu MD, PhD; Tamai, Koji MD, PhD; Shimizu, Takaki MD, PhD; Kakutani, Kenichiro MD, PhD; Kanda, Yutaro MD, PhD; Tominaga, Hiroyuki MD, PhD; Kawamura, Ichiro MD, PhD; Ishihara, Masayuki MD; Paku, Masaaki MD, PhD; Takahashi, Yohei MD, PhD; Funayama, Toru MD, PhD; Miura, Kousei MD, PhD; Shirasawa, Eiki MD; Inoue, Hirokazu MD, PhD; Kimura, Atsushi MD, PhD; Iimura, Takuya MD, PhD; Moridaira, Hiroshi MD, PhD; Nakajima, Hideaki MD, PhD; Watanabe, Shuji MD, PhD; Akeda, Koji MD, PhD; Takegami, Norihiko MD, PhD; Nakanishi, Kazuo MD, PhD; Sawada, Hirokatsu MD, PhD; Matsumoto, Koji MD, PhD; Funaba, Masahiro MD, PhD; Suzuki, Hidenori MD, PhD; Funao, Haruki MD, PhD; Oshigiri, Tsutomu MD, PhD; Hirai, Takashi MD, PhD; Otsuki, Bungo MD, PhD; Kobayakawa, Kazu MD, PhD; Uotani, Koji MD, PhD; Sairyo, Koichi MD, PhD; Tanishima, Shinji MD; Hashimoto, Ko MD, PhD; Iwai, Chizuo MD, PhD; Yamabe, Daisuke MD, PhD; Hiyama, Akihiko MD, PhD; Seki, Shoji MD, PhD; Kato, Kenji MD; Miyazaki, Masashi MD, PhD; Watanabe, Kazuyuki MD, PhD; Nakamae, Toshio MD, PhD; Kaito, Takashi MD, PhD; Nakashima, Hiroaki MD, PhD; Nagoshi, Narihito MD, PhD; Kato, Satoshi MD, PhD; Imagama, Shiro MD, PhD; Watanabe, Kota MD, PhD; Ohtori, Seiji MD, PhD; Inoue, Gen MD, PhD; Furuya, Takeo MD, PhD

Research Authors: Kitagawa, Kyota MD; Maki, Satoshi MD, PhD; Shiratani, Yuki MD; Suzuki, Akinobu MD, PhD; Tamai, Koji MD, PhD; Shimizu, Takaki MD, PhD; Kakutani, Kenichiro MD, PhD; Kanda, Yutaro MD, PhD; Tominaga, Hiroyuki MD, PhD; Kawamura, Ichiro MD, PhD; Ishihara, Masayuki MD; Paku, Masaaki MD, PhD; Takahashi, Yohei MD, PhD; Funayama, Toru MD, PhD; Miura, Kousei MD, PhD; Shirasawa, Eiki MD; Inoue, Hirokazu MD, PhD; Kimura, Atsushi MD, PhD; Iimura, Takuya MD, PhD; Moridaira, Hiroshi MD, PhD; Nakajima, Hideaki MD, PhD; Watanabe, Shuji MD, PhD; Akeda, Koji MD, PhD; Takegami, Norihiko MD, PhD; Nakanishi, Kazuo MD, PhD; Sawada, Hirokatsu MD, PhD; Matsumoto, Koji MD, PhD; Funaba, Masahiro MD, PhD; Suzuki, Hidenori MD, PhD; Funao, Haruki MD, PhD; Oshigiri, Tsutomu MD, PhD; Hirai, Takashi MD, PhD; Otsuki, Bungo MD, PhD; Kobayakawa, Kazu MD, PhD; Uotani, Koji MD, PhD; Sairyo, Koichi MD, PhD; Tanishima, Shinji MD; Hashimoto, Ko MD, PhD; Iwai, Chizuo MD, PhD; Yamabe, Daisuke MD, PhD; Hiyama, Akihiko MD, PhD; Seki, Shoji MD, PhD; Kato, Kenji MD; Miyazaki, Masashi MD, PhD; Watanabe, Kazuyuki MD, PhD; Nakamae, Toshio MD, PhD; Kaito, Takashi MD, PhD; Nakashima, Hiroaki MD, PhD; Nagoshi, Narihito MD, PhD; Kato, Satoshi MD, PhD; Imagama, Shiro MD, PhD; Watanabe, Kota MD, PhD; Ohtori, Seiji MD, PhD; Inoue, Gen MD, PhD; Furuya, Takeo MD, PhD

AIIM Authors: Angelina Chiger, Ethan Lowder

AIIM Authors: Angelina Chiger, Ethan Lowder

Publication Date: Apr 9, 2025

Publication Date: Apr 9, 2025

Comprehensive Summary

This study created computer prediction models to predict the quality of life improvements for cancer patients who had surgery in connection with spinal metastases. Data was collected from 413 patients at around 40 hospitals throughout Japan. This data was tested in different computer algorithms to predict with patients would a better quality of life 1 month and 6 months after surgery. The 6-month prediction model has worked better overall, it correctly identified patients who would improve a success rate of 86.84%. The 1-month model had a success rate of 76.39%. The major factor for predicting improvement in both models was how well patients moved around before surgery. The 6-month model only needed 7 pieces of patient data, but the 1-month model needed 12. The authors acknowledge that predicting outcomes at the 6-month mark looks to be easier than predicting outcomes at the 1-month, probably because the recovery of the patients stabilizes around that time. They also acknowledge that the study had limitations, like the patient pool size.

Outcomes and Implications

The implications are that this study is important because at the current moment doctors have limited number of tools to predict the quality of life after a spinal metastasis surgery. Most existing prediction tools focus on whether the patients will survive and if they will be able to walk. The prediction models from the study could help doctors and patients make better decisions about whether to conduct the surgery or to choose comfort care. This can give patients more realistic expectations about their recovery and potentially identity the patients that would benefit from physical therapy or mobility exercises before the surgery to improve their outcomes. The prediction models performed well or better than other prediction tools used in spinal problems. This can make them more potentially useful in real clinical settings. The authors note that the models need to be tested in other hospitals and healthcare systems before they can be routinely used in patient care.

Our mission is to

Connect medicine with AI innovation.

No spam. Only the latest AI breakthroughs, simplified and relevant to your field.

Our mission is to

Connect medicine with AI innovation.

No spam. Only the latest AI breakthroughs, simplified and relevant to your field.

Our mission is to

Connect medicine with AI innovation.

No spam. Only the latest AI breakthroughs, simplified and relevant to your field.

AIIM Research

Articles

© 2025 AIIM. Created by AIIM IT Team

AIIM Research

Articles

© 2025 AIIM. Created by AIIM IT Team

AIIM Research

Articles

© 2025 AIIM. Created by AIIM IT Team